Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2572 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4460T - 204 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $48.75 vs $239.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900F - $0.28 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
23.728813559322038%
Price, $
$239.99
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
175
85.7843137254902%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Single-Core
802
36.941501612160295%
Multi-Core
2190
23.879620543016028%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |