Key Differences
In short — Core i7-990X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-990X is 607 days older than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-990X
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than FX-4300 - 214 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-990X - $48.02 vs $178.02
- Up to 72% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i7-990X - $0.23 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-990X - 95 vs 130 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 24th, 2011
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
27.710843373493976%
Price, $
$178.02
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5009 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
213
99.53271028037383%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5010 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 24th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-990X | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Feb 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Gulftown | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |