Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7920HQ outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7920HQ is 197 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7920HQ
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 158 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7920HQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
157
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7920HQ | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |