Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6850K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6850K is 1128 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6850K
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-6350 - 171 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-6850K - $100.0 vs $115.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6850K - $0.66 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6850K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 575 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 575 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6850K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |