Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 1208 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 25 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 4% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-640LM - 141 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 6 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
141
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7756 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |