Key Differences
In short — Core i5-760 outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-760 is 192 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 25 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-640LM - 149 vs 148 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |