Buy on Amazon
$89
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $332
Availability
MSRP in USD: $332
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 655 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 25 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-640LM - 251 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 8 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-2700K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72700K
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
