Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3008 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 25 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-640LM - 229 vs 220 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
25 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |