Buy on Amazon
$120
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $332
Availability
MSRP in USD: $332
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1089
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1089
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2336 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 25 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 59% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-640LM - 108 vs 68 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 16 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6900K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
108
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Boxed Core i7-6900K Processor (20MB Cache, up to 3.70 GHz) FC-LGA 2011-v3,BX80671I76900K
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i7-6900K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
