Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 855 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 8% better in Valorant than Celeron G3930T - 749 vs 692 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $39.0 vs $429.95
- Up to 89% better value when playing Valorant than Core i7-5820K - $0.06 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |