Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 2% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8150 - 278 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - $64.03 vs $122.03
- Up to 48% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-3770 - $0.23 vs $0.44 per FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8344 minutes ago
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |