Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3243 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3770 - 122 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - $87.98 vs $122.03
- Up to 33% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-3770 - $0.72 vs $1.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$87.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $87.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |