Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-3635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2223 days newer than Core i7-3635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3635QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 28% better in War Thunder than Core i7-3635QM - 172 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3635QM - 24 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3635QM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |