Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-3630QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2194 days newer than Core i7-3630QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3630QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 14% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-3630QM - 125 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3630QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15755 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3630QM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |