Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Core i7-2820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1995 days newer than Core i7-2820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i7-2820QM - 198 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2820QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2820QM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |