Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1410 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 4% better in HITMAN 3 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 204 vs 197 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $81.79 vs $218.99
- Up to 61% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i7-10700F - $0.42 vs $1.07 per FPS
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
39%
Price, $
$218.99
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $218.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
197
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |