Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7500 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7500 is 1345 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500
- Performs up to 22% better in Rust than FX-6350 - 189 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than FX-6350 - $89.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Rust than FX-6350 - $0.47 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500 - 6 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2041 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |