Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3450S outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3450S is 365 days older than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6350 - 276 vs 274 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than FX-6350 - $95.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6350 - $0.34 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 6 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3172 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |