Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2824 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $24.95 vs $197.65
- Up to 86% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.16 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2500 - 171 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 24 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
154
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$24.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $24.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16110 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
13%
Price, $
$197.65
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |