Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600K is 1128 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 16% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 200 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $177.2 vs $197.65
- Up to 23% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.89 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 24 vs 16 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$177.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $177.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8048 minutes ago
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8048 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |