Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 895 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 660 vs 542 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $165.86 vs $197.65
- Up to 31% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.25 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 24 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
660
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4728 minutes ago
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4728 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |