Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-10210U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 322 days older than Core i5-10210U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10210U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 31% better in League of Legends than Core i5-10210U - 166 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10210U - 24 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10210U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |