Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100T outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100T is 1951 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-6350 - 342 vs 319 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than FX-6350 - $99.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than FX-6350 - $0.29 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 6 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
342
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2397 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |