Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1242 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-9100T - 164 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $75.83 vs $99.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Buy for $75.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
54.067415730337075%
Multi-Core
3178
42.61767466809709%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |