Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 1951 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-6350 - 234 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - $100.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-9100 - $0.45 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2962 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2961 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |