Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8109U outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8109U is 1802 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8109U
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6350 - 182 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 28 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4844 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-8109U
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
