Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i3-8109U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1076 days newer than Core i3-8109U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8109U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 28 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-8109U - 159 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$87.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $87.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |