Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 455 days older than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 32% better in War Thunder than Celeron G4900 - 182 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $49.99 vs $53.55
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 54 vs 60 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74767 minutes ago
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74768 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
42.42424242424242%
Multi-Core
1051
36.58197006613296%
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |