Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7350K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7350K is 455 days older than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G4900 - 175 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $51.6 vs $68.02
- Up to 29% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G4900 - $0.29 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 54 vs 60 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2523 minutes ago
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2524 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |