Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 197 days older than the more expensive Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-7100T - 530 vs 523 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $45.93 vs $75.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Buy for $45.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
94.57627118644068%
Multi-Core
2260
41.24087591240876%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |