Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 855 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $48.1 vs $429.95
- Up to 89% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-5820K - $0.19 vs $1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
254
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |