Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $145.12 vs $492.48
- Up to 61% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 9 7950X - $1.19 vs $3.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 35 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 34% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-7100T - 163 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
122
74%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2156 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.02/FPS
39%
Price, $
$492.48
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $492.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |