Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $51.6 vs $469.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900KF - $0.41 vs $2.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-7100T - 163 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
126
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1704 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.88/FPS
14%
Price, $
$469.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1703 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |