Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $51.6 vs $369.57
- Up to 79% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i7-14700F - $0.39 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 48% better in HITMAN 2 than Core i3-7100T - 198 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 28 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
134
67%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
20%
Price, $
$369.57
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $369.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |