Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1302 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 20% better in Starfield than FX-9590 - 54 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than FX-9590 - $48.1 vs $298.02
- Up to 87% better value when playing Starfield than FX-9590 - $0.89 vs $6.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |