Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1002 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 105% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1620 - 45 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 15% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1620 - $1.89 vs $2.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 51 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - $49.0 vs $85.0
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
45
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85
57%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
22
48.888888888888886%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
84.75336322869956%
Price, $
$49
100%
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
34.25460636515913%
Multi-Core
723
30.950342465753423%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |