Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1128 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $100.0 vs $179.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.5 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-6100 - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
56%
Price, $
$179
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |