Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1610 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1061 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-540 - 317 vs 316 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i3-540 - $37.0 vs $60.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-540 - $0.12 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
317
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarkdale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
73 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |