Key Differences
In short — Core i3-540 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-540 is 1061 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarkdale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
73 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |