Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $45.0 vs $197.65
- Up to 75% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.18 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 73 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Core i3-530 - 273 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 24 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15527 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
273
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
25%
Price, $
$197.65
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15528 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarkdale | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |