Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4330 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4330 is 272 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Performs up to 49% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1620 - 136 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 305 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
38.367729831144466%
Multi-Core
723
33.72201492537313%
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
