Buy on Amazon
$57
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $138
Availability
MSRP in USD: $138
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1544 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $57.0 vs $109.99
- Up to 47% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.27 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-3250 - 215 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core i3-3250 3.50GHz 2 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33250
Buy for $57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
52%
Price, $
$109.99
51%
FPS Winner
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
