Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1709 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $57.0 vs $130.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 3 2200G - $0.09 vs $0.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 9% better in Minecraft than Core i3-3250 - 661 vs 609 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |