Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3758 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 13% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8150 - 143 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 58 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $64.03 vs $94.98
- Up to 24% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-12100F - $0.5 vs $0.66 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
75%
Price, $
$94.98
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6726 minutes ago
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6725 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |