Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 2235 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-4160T - 123 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 28 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-1125G4
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
28 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
