Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 1161 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 31% better in FIFA 23 than EPYC 7551P - 163 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 28 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1125G4 - 64 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-1125G4
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
