Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 2186 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 28 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1125G4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-1125G4
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 120 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
