Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 2186 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 188 vs 177 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 28 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1125G4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-1125G4
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 85 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
