Buy on Amazon
$74.79
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2866 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 11% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Core i5-4460T - 145 vs 131 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 29% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $52.87 vs $74.79
- Up to 23% better value when playing Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron G6900 - $0.4 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G6900 Dual-core (2 Core) 3.40 GHz Processor - Retail Pack
Buy for $74.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
Core i5-4460T
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
131
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52.87
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I5-4460T I5 4460T 1.9 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 6M 35W LGA 1150
Buy for $52.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Core i5-4460T
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
