Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-950 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-950 is 1280 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-950 - $49.0 vs $83.31
- Up to 41% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Core i7-950 - $0.42 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Island 2 than Celeron G1620 - 118 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
116
98.30508474576271%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
59.154929577464785%
Price, $
$83.31
58%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366 Processor
Buy for $83.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
88.33693304535637%
Multi-Core
723
46.08030592734226%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
