Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 240 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 2% better in New World than Celeron B830 - 98 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 6 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2089 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |