Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2792 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 9% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron B830 - 202 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 8 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
202
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2515 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |